A number is rational if it can be written as a fraction of two integers. Its decimal expansion does one of two things: it stops, or a fixed block repeats forever. A decimal that continues forever without a repeating block is irrational. A bar marks the repeating part: . An ellipsis can also show repetition when the pattern is visible, as in . If no repeating pattern is stated or visible, the worksheet treats the continuing decimal as nonrepeating.
Classify each number as rational or irrational and explain why. Example 1. Example 2. Example 3. Example 4. Example 5. Example 6. How would the answer change for a decimal that continues forever with no repeating pattern?
Conversion examples. Write , , and as decimals, and say whether each terminates or repeats.
Both and stop after finitely many places. Put the digits over the matching power of ten:
So both are rational.
The bar in means , and the bar in means . Repeating decimals are rational. For example, if , then
For , subtract the nonrepeating first digit before using the same idea:
The dots in continue the digit , so the number equals . In , the block repeats. If , then
Both are rational.
A decimal that continues forever and has no repeating pattern cannot be written as a ratio of integers. It is irrational. The key is not the dots alone - it is whether the continuation repeats.
Separate the whole part from the fractional part: These decimals terminate. For the third example, This decimal repeats. It remains rational because the original number is a fraction: . A repeating decimal should not be replaced with a finite truncation such as 1.416.
Stops? Rational. Repeat bar or an explicit repeating block? Rational. Continues forever with no repetition? Irrational.
Screenshot any problem on your screen and get the steps. Chrome on a computer; free.